This document contains Carbon Market Watch’s feedback to the European Commission’s proposal to amend the European Climate Law. It analyses the challenges and shortcomings of the proposal and makes a series of recommendations to remedy them.
Carbon Market Watch submitted input on the ‘Draft Standard: Addressing non-permanence/reversals‘. This draft standard has been written by the Methodological Expert Panel (MEP) of the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism, and was up for public consultation from 15 July to 4 August 2025. This draft standard aims to address the more detailed requirements for any Article …
Read more “CMW input for a draft Article 6.4 standard on non-permanence and reversals”
This report evaluates the effectiveness of the Article 6 rulebook against four key criteria: the quality, transparency, accountability, and equity.
The European Commission’s unambitious proposed climate target for 2040 risks becoming riddled with loopholes and delaying urgent climate action. This in-depth analysis explains how and why.
At the Bonn climate conference (SB62) ahead of COP30 in Brazil, there was a mood of upbeat optimism about Article 6 carbon markets. This positivism stands in shrill contrast with all the critical issues that continue to plague Article 6.
The EU’s Emissions Trading System is essential to meeting the European Union’s 2040 climate target. Watering the EU ETS down with international carbon credits or carbon removals will prove fatal, concludes this study
17 June 2025 | 10:30-11:45 CET | In person
While we appreciate the detailed work of the Methodological Expert Panel on the important process of baseline setting, we do not see all elements of the Article 6.4 Rules, Modalities and Procedures (RMPs) reflected in the proposed Standard.
Specifically, we see the need for further alignment of the baseline provisions with encouraging ambition over time and alignment with nationally determined contributions, long-term low-emission development strategies and particularly the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement.
Analysis of the available documents has found that PoA 10415, over the monitoring periods 5, 6 and 7, is likely set to issue 26 more credits than it should have according to available literature.