Established in 2005, the European Union’s Emissions Trading System covers some 10,000 industrial installations in the energy and manufacturing sectors, together representing about two fifths of the EU’s carbon footprint.
The EU ETS is what is known as a cap-and-trade system. This means that it imposes a declining ceiling on total emissions but allows companies covered by the system to trade their emissions allowances among themselves.
Historically, the EU ETS suffered from a surplus of pollution permits, low carbon prices and an excessive supply of allowances handed to heavy industry free of charge. While the reformed EU ETS has tackled some of these issues, it continues to give away too many freebies. The revamped EU ETS will be expanded to cover road transport and buildings from 2027, with carbon pricing levied on fuels used within our homes and vehicles. As citizens will be expected to pay for their pollution, it’s time that industrial emitters pay their fair share.
Since 2010, the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) has striven to rein in manufacturing-related emissions in the EU by implementing what are known best available technologies. The IED is the main legal instrument regulating pollution from industrial installations. It regulates pollution from around 50,000 large industrial installations in Europe, which emit 736 million tonnes of CO2 or about 40% of the bloc’s total carbon footprint.
Despite its aim of limiting industrial emissions, the IED is riddled with omissions and exemptions.Although it helps to reduce air pollution and protect the environment, the IED suffers one devastating blindspot: it does not deal with climate-warming greenhouse gases.
When it comes to the EU ETS and IED, Carbon Market Watch focuses on:
“The EU ETS and the IED can help the European Union speed up its decarbonisation goals, achieve its climate targets and ensure that nobody is left behind. But to realise this potential requires urgent and substantial reform. “
Eleanor Scott
Expert on EU carbon markets
“The EU ETS and the IED can help the European Union speed up its decarbonisation goals, achieve its climate targets and ensure that nobody is left behind. But to realise this potential requires urgent and substantial reform. “
Eleanor Scott
Expert on EU carbon markets
Eliminating free pollution permits from the EU ETS
Strengthening social protections under the EU ETS
Ensuring direct emission reduction is preferred to offsetting
Expanding the IED to cover greenhouse gas emissions
By confronting the aviation industry’s full climate impact, our research shows that by applying the polluter-pays principle and expanding carbon pricing to non-covered aviation climate impacts, there could be a
The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), which requires polluters to pay for their emissions, was a world first, yet international aviation emissions are still exempt from ETS pricing despite their
This document contains Carbon Market Watch’s feedback to the European Commission’s proposal to amend the European Climate Law. It analyses the challenges and shortcomings of the proposal and makes a
Heavy industries covered by the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) received most of their pollution permits for free, effectively subsidising Europe’s dirtiest businesses, a new report by Carbon Market Watch and WWF reveals. This wasteful and inefficient policy cost society €40 billion.
Our latest FAQ has the answers to everything you always wanted to know about the EU Emissions Trading System revenues
sam.vandenplas[at]carbonmarketwatch.org
lidia.tamellini[at]carbonmarketwatch.org
eleanor.scott[at]carbonmarketwatch.org
Stay in touch and receive our monthly newsletter, campaign updates, event invites and more.
